[openstack-dev] [Telco][NFV] Telco Working Group meetings suspended

Steve Gordon sgordon at redhat.com
Fri Apr 15 18:16:03 UTC 2016

Hi all,

As discussed at this week's meeting [1] all user stories have now been moved from telcowg-usecases to openstack-userstories and we will be suspending the Telco Working Group meetings moving forward. Participants are encouraged to attend one of the two weekly Product Working Group meeting times [2] to discuss and advocate for the relevant user stories going forward. Please also note that there is a product-wg mailing list [3] for discussion of same.

For those attending summit please note these collaboration sessions:

* OPNFV and OpenStack Collaboration BoF [4]
* Ops: NFV/Telco [5]



[1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/telcowg/2016/telcowg.2016-04-13-14.01.html
[2] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#OpenStack_Product_WG
[3] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/product-wg/
[4] https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/7510?goback=1
[5] https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9522?goback=1

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Gordon" <sgordon at redhat.com>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Calum Loudon" <Calum.Loudon at metaswitch.com>
> > 
> > Thanks Steve
> > 
> > I agree with moving to the PWG.
> > 
> > On that topic, do you know what's happened to some of the user stories we
> > proposed, specifically https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290060/ and
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290347/?  Neither shows up in
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/openstack-user-stories
> This query includes status:open, and those two reviews were merged already so
> they don't show up.
> > but there is a https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290991/ which seems to be a
> > copy of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290060/ with the template help
> > text
> > added back in and no mention of the original?
> From Shamail's comment in 290991:
>     This change should be used to discuss and refine the concept. Can the
>     user story owner please make a minor change to show ownership?
> Basically they opened new reviews with a minor change to trigger further
> discussion. I'm not in love with this approach versus just discussing it on
> the original move request but it is the way it is being done for now. W.r.t.
> 290060 I believe you probably meant to include another link but I imagine
> the situation is the same.
> -Steve

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list