On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Masahito MUROI < muroi.masahito at lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > Hi Doc team folks, > > Congress team plans to add API reference into [1] instead of [2] to > follow official documentation project. But I found the design session > about a API docs style[3]. > > For now, is it ok to add API reference [1], or should we wait the > decision about style of API reference repository? > Thanks for asking! The nova proof-of-concept is now publishing here as of yesterday: http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/ I'm working on updating the instructions here: http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/api-guides.html With more updates now: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/306076/ Appreciate you reaching out to the list. And thanks Andreas for keeping up too. :) Anne > > 1. http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref.html > 2. http://docs.openstack.org/developer/congress/ > 3. > > https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9479?goback=1 > > best regard, > Masahito > > -- > 室井 雅仁(Masahito MUROI) > Software Innovation Center, NTT > Tel: +81-422-59-4539 > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Anne Gentle www.justwriteclick.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160415/d7c319c6/attachment.html>