Open Stack

Jeremy, thank you, that's excellent news. The Infra team is doing awesome
work to improve the processes in all possible ways.

Andreas, I will take a closer look, but it seems to be exactly what I had
in mind. Thanks for sharing!

--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote:

> On 04/14/2016 06:30 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>
>> On 2016-04-14 12:57:38 +0300 (+0300), Oleg Gelbukh wrote:
>>
>>> The thread I'm referring to in the prev message is:
>>>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-January/000624.html
>>>
>>
>> At this point it's probably no longer a concern. We don't (and
>> haven't for some time) really support pip versions as old as the
>> ones which predate prerelease identification in their version
>> parsing so could probably just start running the same sdist
>> publication to PyPI for prereleases as we do for full release
>> version tags.
>>
>
> this one merged recently:
> https://review.openstack.org/300124
>
> I think it does what you describe - or is anything else to do?
>
> Andreas
> --
>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>    GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
>        HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160415/96264058/attachment.html>