Open Stack

It still was more common then not I think? So making it less common is probably a step on the wrong direction.

Thanks,
Kevin 
________________________________________
From: Daniel P. Berrange [berrange at redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 9:36 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FYI: Removing default flavors from nova

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 04:29:00PM +0000, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> It feels kind of like a defcore issue though. Its harder for app
> developers to create stuff like heat templates intended for cross
> cloud that recommend a size, m1.small, without a common reference.

Even with Nova defining these default flavours, it didn't do anything
to help solve this problem as all the public cloud operators were
just deleting these flavours & creating their own. So it just gave
people a false sense of standardization where none actually existed.


Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev