Open Stack

+1 to Egor, I think that the final goal of Magnum is container as a service
but not coe deployment as a service. ;-)

Especially we are also working on Magnum UI, the Magnum UI should export
some interfaces to enable end user can create container applications but
not only coe deployment.

I hope that the Magnum can be treated as another "Nova" which is focusing
on container service. I know it is difficult to unify all of the concepts
in different coe (k8s has pod, service, rc, swarm only has container, nova
only has VM, PM with different hypervisors), but this deserve some deep
dive and thinking to see how can move forward.....

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Egor Guz <EGuz at walmartlabs.com> wrote:

> definitely ;), but the are some thoughts to Tom’s email.
>
> I agree that we shouldn't reinvent apis, but I don’t think Magnum should
> only focus at deployment (I feel we will become another Puppet/Chef/Ansible
> module if we do it ):)
> I belive our goal should be seamlessly integrate Kub/Mesos/Swarm to
> OpenStack ecosystem (Neutron/Cinder/Barbican/etc) even if we need to step
> in to Kub/Mesos/Swarm communities for that.
>
> —
> Egor
>
> From: Adrian Otto <adrian.otto at rackspace.com<mailto:
> adrian.otto at rackspace.com>>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>
> Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 08:44
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]swarm + compose = k8s?
>
> This is definitely a topic we should cover in Tokyo.
>
> On Sep 29, 2015, at 8:28 AM, Daneyon Hansen (danehans) <danehans at cisco.com
> <mailto:danehans at cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
> From: Tom Cammann <tom.cammann at hpe.com<mailto:tom.cammann at hpe.com>>
> Reply-To: "openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
> Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 2:22 AM
> To: "openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]swarm + compose = k8s?
>
> This has been my thinking in the last couple of months to completely
> deprecate the COE specific APIs such as pod/service/rc and container.
>
> As we now support Mesos, Kubernetes and Docker Swarm its going to be very
> difficult and probably a wasted effort trying to consolidate their separate
> APIs under a single Magnum API.
>
> I'm starting to see Magnum as COEDaaS - Container Orchestration Engine
> Deployment as a Service.
>
> On 29/09/15 06:30, Ton Ngo wrote:
> Would it make sense to ask the opposite of Wanghua's question: should
> pod/service/rc be deprecated if the user can easily get to the k8s api?
> Even if we want to orchestrate these in a Heat template, the corresponding
> heat resources can just interface with k8s instead of Magnum.
> Ton Ngo,
>
> <ATT00001.gif>Egor Guz ---09/28/2015 10:20:02 PM---Also I belive docker
> compose is just command line tool which doesn’t have any api or scheduling
> feat
>
> From: Egor Guz <EGuz at walmartlabs.com><mailto:EGuz at walmartlabs.com>
> To: "openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org"<mailto:
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> ><mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 09/28/2015 10:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]swarm + compose = k8s?
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> Also I belive docker compose is just command line tool which doesn’t have
> any api or scheduling features.
> But during last Docker Conf hackathon PayPal folks implemented docker
> compose executor for Mesos (https://github.com/mohitsoni/compose-executor)
> which can give you pod like experience.
>
> —
> Egor
>
> From: Adrian Otto <adrian.otto at rackspace.com<mailto:
> adrian.otto at rackspace.com><mailto:adrian.otto at rackspace.com>>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> ><mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
> Date: Monday, September 28, 2015 at 22:03
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> ><mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]swarm + compose = k8s?
>
> Wanghua,
>
> I do follow your logic, but docker-compose only needs the docker API to
> operate. We are intentionally avoiding re-inventing the wheel. Our goal is
> not to replace docker swarm (or other existing systems), but to compliment
> it/them. We want to offer users of Docker the richness of native APIs and
> supporting tools. This way they will not need to compromise features or
> wait longer for us to implement each new feature as it is added. Keep in
> mind that our pod, service, and replication controller resources pre-date
> this philosophy. If we started out with the current approach, those would
> not exist in Magnum.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adrian
>
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 8:32 PM, 王华 <wanghua.humble at gmail.com<mailto:
> wanghua.humble at gmail.com><mailto:wanghua.humble at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Magnum now exposes service, pod, etc to users in kubernetes coe, but
> exposes container in swarm coe. As I know, swarm is only a scheduler of
> container, which is like nova in openstack. Docker compose is a
> orchestration program which is like heat in openstack. k8s is the
> combination of scheduler and orchestration. So I think it is better to
> expose the apis in compose to users which are at the same level as k8s.
>
>
> Regards
> Wanghua
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org><mailto:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> <mailto:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> <mailto:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> <ATT00001.gif>__________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Thanks,

Jay Lau (Guangya Liu)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150930/0c8cedbb/attachment.html>