[openstack-dev] [Cinder] PTL Candidacy

Duncan Thomas duncan.thomas at gmail.com
Tue Sep 15 20:46:02 UTC 2015


Voting is done by formal ballot just before the summit. All Cinder ATCs
will be invited to vote. Voting on the mailing list is just noise.

On 15 September 2015 at 23:40, Nikesh Kumar Mahalka <
nikeshmahalka at vedams.com> wrote:

> Thanks Sean, Vote +1.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:36 AM, hao wang <sxmatch1986 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Sean, Vote +1.
>>
>> 2015-09-14 22:49 GMT+08:00 Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmx.com>:
>> > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > I'm announcing my candidacy for Cinder PTL for the Mitaka release.
>> >
>> > The Cinder team has made great progress. We've not only grown the
>> > number of supported backend drivers, but we've made significant
>> > improvements to the core code and raised the quality of existing
>> > and incoming code contributions. While there are still many things
>> > that need more polish, we are headed in the right direction and
>> > block storage is a strong, stable component to many OpenStack clouds.
>> >
>> > Mike and John have provided the leadership to get the project where
>> > it is today. I would like to keep that momentum going.
>> >
>> > I've spent over a decade finding new and interesting ways to create
>> > and delete volumes. I also work across many different product teams
>> > and have had a lot of experience collaborating with groups to find
>> > a balance between the work being done to best benefit all involved.
>> >
>> > I think I can use this experience to foster collaboration both within
>> > the Cinder team as well as between Cinder and other related projects
>> > that interact with storage services.
>> >
>> > Some topics I would like to see focused on for the Mitaka release
>> > would be:
>> >
>> >  * Complete work of making the Cinder code Python3 compatible.
>> >  * Complete conversion to objects.
>> >  * Sort out object inheritance and appropriate use of ABC.
>> >  * Continued stabilization of third party CI.
>> >  * Make sure there is a good core feature set regardless of backend
>> type.
>> >  * Reevaluate our deadlines to make sure core feature work gets enough
>> >    time and allows drivers to implement support.
>> >
>> > While there are some things I think we need to do to move the project
>> > forward, I am mostly open to the needs of the community as a whole
>> > and making sure that what we are doing is benefiting OpenStack and
>> > making it a simpler, easy to use, and ubiquitous platform for the
>> > cloud.
>> >
>> > Thank you for your consideration!
>> >
>> > Sean McGinnis (smcginnis)
>> >
>> >
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Wishes For You!
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
-- 
Duncan Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150915/fc79d7b2/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list