[openstack-dev] [devstack][keystone][ironic] Use only Keystone v3 API in DevStack

Dolph Mathews dolph.mathews at gmail.com
Fri Sep 11 20:01:02 UTC 2015


On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Yee, Guang <guang.yee at hpe.com> wrote:

> Can you please elaborate on "granularity of policy support within
> Ironic."? Is there a blueprint/etherpad we can take a look?
>

See the lack of granularity expressed by Ironic's current policy file:


https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/5671e7c2df455f97ef996c47c9c4f461a82e1c38/etc/ironic/policy.json


>
>
> Guang
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Devananda van der Veen [mailto:devananda.vdv at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 10:25 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][keystone][ironic] Use only
> Keystone v3 API in DevStack
>
> We (the Ironic team) have talked a couple times about keystone /v3 support
> and about improving the granularity of policy support within Ironic. No one
> stepped up to work on these specifically, and they weren't prioritized
> during Liberty ... but I think everyone agreed that we should get on with
> the keystone v3 relatively soon.
>
> If Ironic is the only integrated project that doesn't support v3 yet, then
> yea, we should get on that as soon as M opens.
>
> -Devananda
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Short story/question:
> > Is keystone /v3 support important to the ironic team? For Mitaka i guess?
> >
> > Long story:
> > The previous discussion - guidance from keystone team on magnum
> > (http://markmail.org/message/jchf2vj752jdzfet) motivated me to dig
> > into the experimental job we have in devstack for full keystone v3 api
> > and ended up with this review.
> >
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/221300/
> >
> > So essentially that rips out v2 keystone pipeline *except* for ironic
> jobs.
> > as ironic has some hard-coded dependencies to keystone /v2 api. I've
> > logged a bug here:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1494776
> >
> > Note that review above depends on Jamie's tempest patch which had some
> > hard coded /v2 dependency as well
> > (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214987/)
> >
> > follow up question:
> > Does anyone know of anything else that does not work with /v3?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dims
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> > OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150911/f68d466d/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list