[openstack-dev] [neutron] subnetallocation is in core resource, while there is a extension for it?

Tidwell, Ryan ryan.tidwell at hp.com
Tue Sep 1 23:59:07 UTC 2015


This was a compromise we made toward the end of Kilo.  The subnetpools resource was implemented as a core resource, but for purposes of Horizon interaction and a lack of another method for evolving the Neutron API we deliberately added a shim extension.  I believe this was done with a couple other “extensions” like VLAN transparent networks.  I don’t think we want to remove the shim extension.

-Ryan

From: gong_ys2004 [mailto:gong_ys2004 at aliyun.com]
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 9:45 PM
To: openstack-dev
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] subnetallocation is in core resource, while there is a extension for it?




Hi, neutron guys,

look at https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/extensions/subnetallocation.py,

which defines an extension Subnetallocation but defines no extension resource. Actually, it is implemented

in core resource.

So I think we should remove this extension.



I filed a bug for it:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1490815





Regards,

yong sheng gong
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150901/abcecb5a/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list