Open Stack

Matt,

Thank you for bring this topic to the ML.

In cinder, we've merged [1] patch to unblock gates. I've proposed other
patch [2] to fix global-requirements for the stable/liberty branch.


[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239837/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239799/

Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny,
http://blog.e0ne.info/

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Matt Riedemann <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> wrote:

>
>
> On 10/28/2015 9:22 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/28/2015 9:06 AM, Yuriy Nesenenko wrote:
>>
>>> Hi. Look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239837/
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Matt Riedemann
>>> <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     That job is failing at a decent rate, tracking with bug:
>>>
>>>     https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1510656
>>>
>>>     It lines up with the novaclient 2.33 release on 10/27, I'm checking
>>>     out what the change was that caused the regression.
>>>
>>>     This is a heads up that rechecks on this failure probably won't help.
>>>
>>>     So far I haven't seen any related patches up to fix it although
>>>     there were already 2 bugs reported when I got in this morning.
>>>
>>>     --
>>>
>>>     Thanks,
>>>
>>>     Matt Riedemann
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>     Unsubscribe:
>>>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>
>>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>> Heh, well that's 3 bugs then, I didn't see that one. jgriffith and I
>> were talking in IRC about just handling both exceptions in cinder to fix
>> this but we also agreed that this is a backward incompatible change on
>> the novaclient side, which was also discussed in the original novaclient
>> wishlist bug that prompted the breaking change.
>>
>> Given the backward compat issues, we might not just be breaking cinder
>> here, so I've proposed a revert of the novaclient change with
>> justification in the commit message:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239941/
>>
>> At least with the cinder change above we're OK for mitaka, and logstash
>> isn't yet showing failures for cinder in stable/liberty, but given the
>> requirements there it will be a failure in cinder python34 tests in
>> stalbe/liberty also - so we can backport the cinder fix or block the
>> 2.33 novaclient version on stable/liberty global-requirements depending
>> on what we do with the proposed novaclient revert.
>>
>>
> I have an alternative to the revert here:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239963/
>
> That makes novaclient.exceptions.RequestTimeout extend requests.Timeout so
> that older cinder continues to work.
>
> I also have changes to block novaclient 2.33.0 in g-r on master and
> stable/liberty:
>
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I6e7657b60308b30eed89b269810c1f37cce43063,n,z
>
> I personally think we need to block 2.33.0 since it breaks cinder, then
> release a new version of novaclient with either the revert or the
> alternative change to extend requests.Timeout.
>
> If we block novaclient 2.33.0 then we can also revert the workaround in
> cinder (which would start breaking if we reverted the new exception type
> out of novaclient w/o blacklisting 2.33 first).
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Riedemann
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151029/56e7ebf8/attachment.html>