Open Stack

Hi,

The policy should be revert, IMHO. cherry-pick doesn't guarantee the
consistency, so it will take more time... Also this way gives time to write
tests to exclude the regression in future.


--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Matthew Mosesohn <mmosesohn at mirantis.com>
wrote:

> Hi Fuelers,
>
> It seems we have a regression on two critical bugs because of switching
> Fuel to puppet-openstacklib:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1507685
>
> This regressed to patches that were in Fuel Library that addressed two
> bugs marked as Critical.
>
> We should improve the acceptance criteria for moving to upstream modules
> to ensure no bugs are regressed that relate to the particular Puppet module
> being migrated.
>
> Secondly, what should our policy be? Revert the switch to upstream module?
> Or just work on cherry-picking the appropriate fixes?
>
> Best Regards,
> Matthew Mosesohn
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151019/09491249/attachment.html>