[openstack-dev] [fuel] OpenStack versioning in Fuel
ogelbukh at mirantis.com
Fri Oct 16 10:02:10 UTC 2015
The point is that there's no 2015.2.0 version anywhere in OpenStack. So
every component will be versioned separately, for example, in Libery, Nova
has version 12.0.0, and minor release of it is going to have version
12.0.1, while Keystone, for instance, will have version 11.0.0 and 11.0.1
for minor release.
The problem in Fuel is that coordinated release version is used in several
places, the most important being installation path of the fuel-library. We
won't be able to use it the same way since Liberty. I'd like to understand
how we are going to handle that.
My suggestion actually is to move away from using OpenStack version as a
part of Fuel version. Then the path to install the fuel-library will be
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Igor Kalnitsky <ikalnitsky at mirantis.com>
> Hey Oleg,
> I've read the post  and I didn't get how exactly minor releases of
> *stable* branch will be versioned?
> Let's say 2015.2.0 is Liberty. How 2015.2.1 will be versioned?
>  http://ttx.re/new-versioning.html
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Oleg Gelbukh <ogelbukh at mirantis.com>
> > Hello,
> > I would like to highlight a problem that we are now going to have in Fuel
> > regarding versioning of OpenStack.
> > As you know, with introduction of the Big Tent policy it was decided that
> > since Liberty dev cycle versioning schema of the whole project changes.
> > Year-based versions won't be assigned to individual projects, nor the
> > coordinated release is going to have unified number . Individual
> > will have semver version numbers, while numbering of the release itself
> > seems to be dropped.
> > However, in Fuel there is a lot of places where we use year-based
> version of
> > OpenStack release.  How are we going to handle this? Shall we have
> > openstack_version: 2015.2 all over the place? Or we should come up with
> > something more sophisticated? Or just drop OpenStack version component
> > our versioning schema for good?
> > Please, share your opinions here or in corresponding reviews.
> >  http://ttx.re/new-versioning.html
> >  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234296/
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Oleg Gelbukh
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev