[openstack-dev] [Zaqar][cli][openstackclient] conflict in nova flavor and zaqar flavor

Victoria Martínez de la Cruz victoria at vmartinezdelacruz.com
Tue Oct 13 12:28:16 UTC 2015


Fair enough, +1 to Flavio's suggestion

Thanks all,

Victoria

2015-10-13 3:35 GMT-03:00 Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com>:

> On 12/10/15 19:25 -0300, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz wrote:
>
>> HI all,
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback. We discussed this topic in this week weekly
>> meeting
>> and we came to the conclusion that it would be better to use "pool-flavor"
>> instead of creating a namespace for Zaqar only (by prefixing everything
>> with
>> the "message" key).
>>
>> So, this commands would look like
>>
>> openstack pool-flavor create
>> openstack pool-flavor get
>> openstack pool-flavor delete
>> openstack pool-flavor update
>> openstack pool-flavor list
>>
>
> First and foremost, I'm sorry for not attending the last meeting.
>
> I just read the logs from the meeting and I'd like to raise my
> concerns with the above. I think it's very confusing for users to have
> a non-namespaced command.
>
> For example, what's a pool-flavor? Is it related to Nova's flavors? Is
> it something related to some network pools? etc.
>
> I understand that one of the concerns is that things like `openstack
> message message post` wouldn't look good but I think that the project
> namespace could match the service catalog (will let folks for OSC
> confirm/deny this).
>
> Some examples:
>
> $ openstack messaging post
> $ openstack messaging flavor create
> $ openstack messaging pool add
>
> etc
>
> Does the above make sense?
> Flavio
>
>
>
>> Best,
>>
>> Victoria
>>
>> 2015-10-10 10:10 GMT-03:00 Shifali Agrawal <shaifali.agrawal09 at gmail.com
>> >:
>>
>>    All right, thanks for responses, will code accordingly :)
>>
>>    On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>
>>    wrote:
>>
>>        Excerpts from Steve Martinelli's message of 2015-10-06 16:09:32
>> -0400:
>>        >
>>        > Using `message flavor` works for me, and having two words is just
>>        fine.
>>
>>        It might even be good to change "flavor" to "server flavor"
>> (keeping
>>        flavor as a backwards-compatible alias, of course).
>>              Doug
>>              >
>>        > I'm in the process of collecting all of the existing "object"
>> works
>>        are
>>        > putting them online, there's a lot of them. Hopefully this will
>>        reduce the
>>        > collisions in the future.
>>        >
>>        > Thanks,
>>        >
>>        > Steve Martinelli
>>        > OpenStack Keystone Core
>>        >
>>        >
>>        >
>>        > From:    Shifali Agrawal <shaifali.agrawal09 at gmail.com>
>>        > To:    openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>        > Date:    2015/10/06 03:40 PM
>>        > Subject:    [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][cli][openstack-client]
>> conflict
>>        in nova
>>        >             flavor and zaqar flavor
>>        >
>>        >
>>        >
>>        > Greetings,
>>        >
>>        > I am implementing cli commands for Zaqar flavors, the command
>> should
>>        be
>>        > like:
>>        >
>>        > "openstack flavor <create/update/delete>"
>>        >
>>        > But there is already same command present for Nova flavors. After
>>        > discussing with Zaqar devs we thought to change all zaqar
>> commands
>>        such
>>        > that they include `message` word after openstack, thus above
>> Zaqar
>>        flavor
>>        > command will become:
>>        >
>>        > "openstack message flavor <create/update/delete>"
>>        >
>>        > Does openstack-client devs have something to say for this? Or
>> they
>>        also
>>        > feel its good to move with adding `message` word to all Zaqar cli
>>        > commands?
>>        >
>>        > Already existing Zaqar commands will work with get a deprecation
>>        > message/warning and also I will implement them all to work with
>>        `message`
>>        > word, and all new commands will be implement so that they work
>> only
>>        with
>>        > `message` word.
>>
>>
>>  __________________________________________________________________________
>>        OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>        Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?
>>        subject:unsubscribe
>>        http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  __________________________________________________________________________
>>    OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>    Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> --
> @flaper87
> Flavio Percoco
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151013/ab7b0068/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list