[openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

Monty Taylor mordred at inaugust.com
Thu Oct 8 14:43:01 UTC 2015

On 10/08/2015 09:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
>> Operational overhead has a cost - maintaining 3 different database
>> tools, backing them up, providing HA, etc. has operational cost.
>> This is not to say that this cannot be overseen, but it should be taken
>> into consideration.
>> And *if* they can be consolidated into an agreed solution across the
>> whole of OpenStack - that would be highly beneficial (IMHO).
> Agreed, and that ties into the similar discussion we recently had about
> picking a common DLM. Ideally we'd only add *one* general dependency and
> use it for locks / leader election / syncing status around.


All of the proposed DLM tools can fill this space successfully. There is 
definitely not a need for multiple.

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list