Open Stack

On 07/10/15 10:17 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-10-07 16:50:16 +0900:
>> On 06/10/15 23:36 +0900, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>> >Greetings,
>> >
>> >Not so long ago, Erno started a thread[0] in this list to discuss the
>> >abandon policies for patches that haven't been updated in Glance.
>> >
>> >I'd like to go forward and start following that policy with some
>> >changes that you can find below:
>> >
>> >1) Lets do this on patches that haven't had any activity in the last 2
>> >months. This adds one more month to Erno's proposal. The reason being
>> >that during the lat cycle, there were some ups and downs in the review
>> >flow that caused some patches to get stuck.
>> >
>> >2) Do this just on master, for all patches regardless they fix a
>> >bug or implement a spec and for all patches regardless their review
>> >status.
>> >
>> >3) The patch will be first marked as a WIP and then abandoned if the
>> >patch is not updated in 1 week. This will put this patches at the
>> >begining of the queue but using the Glance review dashboard should
>> >help keeing focus.
>> >
>> >Unless there are some critical things missing in the above or strong
>> >opiniones against this, I'll make this effective starting next Monday
>> >October 12th.
>>
>> I'd like to provide some extra data here. This is our current status:
>>
>> ==============================================================
>> Total patches without activity in the last 2 months: 73
>> Total patches closing a bug: 30
>> Total patches with negative review by core reviewers: 62
>> Total patches with negative review by non-core reviewers: 75
>> Total patches without a core review in the last patchset: 13
>> Total patches with negative review from Jenkins: 50
>> ==============================================================
>>
>> It's not ideal but it's also not a lot. I'd like to recover as many
>> patches as possible from the above and I'm happy to do that manually
>> if necessary.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Flavio
>>
>
>It might be useful to schedule a review sprint to take a couple of days
>to focus on reviews. Maybe the team can pick dates a couple of weeks in
>advance so everyone can get permission to spend the full time on
>reviews.

+1 This is something I've planned.

Flavio

-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151008/46a9c278/attachment.pgp>