Open Stack

On 11/23/2015 4:50 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
> 2015-11-23 17:31 GMT+01:00 Matt Riedemann <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
>>> Or do you also suggest juno-eol != 2014.2.4?
>> I'd prefer to just remove the version tag in setup.cfg entirely so we switch
>> to post-versioning, then we can EOL the thing. That's what we do internally
>> on EOL stable branches (switch to post-versioning since we have our own
>> release cycles). And I'd be OK with this just to keep stable/kilo moving
>> until juno is EOL'ed.
>
> Where is stable/kilo blocked because of this?? There shouldn't be
> anything merged after 2014.2.4 tag
> i.e. juno-eol == 2014.2.4
>
> Cheers,
> Alan
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

I thought we'd be hitting this kind of issue [1] on stable/kilo changes 
that run grenade where the old side is juno, and I though pbr would blow 
up installing those, but so far I haven't seen any job failures like 
that to indicate it's a problem.

[1] 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-October/076928.html

-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann