[openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

Davanum Srinivas davanum at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 21:09:01 UTC 2015


Graham,

Agree. Hence the Tooz as the abstraction layer. Folks are welcome to
write new drivers or fix existing drivers for Tooz where needed.

-- Dims

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hayes, Graham <graham.hayes at hpe.com> wrote:
> On 04/11/15 20:04, Ed Leafe wrote:
>> On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Davanum Srinivas <davanum at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's a Devstack review for zookeeper in support of this initiative:
>>>
>>> https://review.openstack.org/241040
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dims
>>
>> I thought that the operators at that session made it very clear that they would *not* run any Java applications, and that if OpenStack required a Java app to run, they would no longer use it.
>>
>> I like the idea of using Zookeeper as the DLM, but I don't think it should be set up as a default, even for devstack, given the vehement opposition expressed.
>>
>>
>> -- Ed Leafe
>>
>
> I got the impression that there was *some* operators that wouldn't run
> java.
>
> I do not see an issue with having ZooKeeper as the default, as long as
> there is an alternate solution that also works for the operators that do
> not want to use it.
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list