Open Stack

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:51:35AM -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Btw, if u *do not* want to do a spec (using [1]) or blueprint let me know
> and I'll probably make a spec so that we can ensure (and agree on) the
> semantics of this because the specifics of what 'cancel' or 'abort' means
> start to matter.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/openstack/oslo-specs/blob/master/specs/template.rst
> 
> -Josh
> 

Cool!

I will review the patch and come up with a Spec about abort/cancel.

New features discussed in the fishbowl will add considerable benefits
and probably facilitate its adoption in more projects.

Cheers,
Gorka.

> Joshua Harlow wrote:
> >Feel free to add it, or open a blueprint, or make a spec to :)
> >
> >Any of the above are ok with me.
> >
> >I did start prototyping something @
> >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184663/ (external cancellation) but it
> >might be going in the wrong direction (or a different direction); so
> >feel free to comment on that review if so...
> >
> >-Josh
> >
> >Gorka Eguileor wrote:
> >>On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 08:47:42AM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >>>Hi Team,
> >>>
> >>>Here are the etherpads from the summit[1].
> >>
> >>I remember that in Taskflow's Fishbowl session we discussed not only
> >>pause/yield option but abort/cancel for long running tasks as well, but
> >>reviewing the Etherpad now I don't see it there.
> >>
> >>Should I just add it to "Ideas for Liberty" section or there's a
> >>specific reason why it wasn't included?
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>Gorka.
> >>
> >>>Some highlights are as follows:
> >>>Oslo.messaging : Took status of the existing zmq driver, proposed a
> >>>new driver in parallel to the existing zmq driver. Also looked at
> >>>possibility of using Pika with RabbitMQ. Folks from pivotal promised
> >>>to help with our scenarios as well.
> >>>Oslo.rootwrap : Debated daemon vs a new privileged service. The Nova
> >>>change to add rootwrap as daemon is on hold pending progress on the
> >>>privsep proposal/activity.
> >>>Oslo.versionedobjects : We had a nice presentation from Dan about what
> >>>o.vo can do and a deepdive into what we could do in next release.
> >>>Taskflow : Josh and team came up with several new features and how to
> >>>improve usability
> >>>
> >>>We will also have several new libraries in Liberty (oslo.cache,
> >>>oslo.service, oslo.reports, futurist, automaton etc). We talked about
> >>>our release processes, functional testing, deprecation strategies and
> >>>debated a but about how best to move to async models as well. Please
> >>>see etherpads for detailed information.
> >>>
> >>>thanks,
> >>>dims
> >>>
> >>>[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Liberty/Etherpads#Oslo
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
> >>>
> >>>__________________________________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >>>Unsubscribe:
> >>>OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>
> >>__________________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >>Unsubscribe:
> >>OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >__________________________________________________________________________
> >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev