[openstack-dev] Mellanox request for permission for Nova CI

Lenny Verkhovsky lennyb at mellanox.com
Mon May 4 15:25:17 UTC 2015


Thanks Matt,
We will start Nova non-voting commenting.


Lenny Verkhovsky
SW Engineer,  Mellanox Technologies
www.mellanox.com 

Office:    +972 74 712 9244
Mobile:  +972 54 554 0233
Fax:        +972 72 257 9400

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 6:20 PM
To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Mellanox request for permission for Nova CI



On 5/3/2015 10:32 AM, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote:
> Hi Dan and the team,
>
> Here you can see full logs and tempest.conf  
> http://144.76.193.39/ci-artifacts/Check-MLNX-Nova-ML2-Sriov-driver_POR
> T_20150503_1854/ ( suspend-resume test is skipped and we are checking 
> this issue )
>
> Except of running Tempest API on Mellanox flavor VM we are also 
> running 
> tempest.scenario.test_network_advanced_server_ops.TestNetworkAdvancedS
> erverOps With configured port_vnic_type = direct
>
> We will add more tests in the future.
>
> Thanks in advance.
> Lenny Verkhovsky
> SW Engineer,  Mellanox Technologies
> www.mellanox.com
>
> Office:    +972 74 712 9244
> Mobile:  +972 54 554 0233
> Fax:        +972 72 257 9400
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Smith [mailto:dms at danplanet.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 7:43 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Mellanox request for permission for Nova 
> CI
>
> Hi Lenny,
>
>> Is there anything missing for us to start 'non-voting' Nova CI ?
>
> Sorry for the slow response from the team.
>
> The results that you've posted look good to me. A quick scan of the tempest results don't seem to indicate any new tests that are specifically testing SRIOV things. I assume this is mostly implied because of the flavor you're configuring for testing, right?
>
> Could you also persist the tempest.conf just so it's easy to see?
>
> Regardless of the above, I think that the results look clean enough to start commenting on patches, IMHO. So, count me as +1.
>
> --Dan
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

+1 for non-voting on nova changes from me.  Looks like it's running
tests from the tempest repo and not a private third party repo which is good.

-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list