[openstack-dev] [cinder] Deadline For Volume Drivers to Be Readded

Tom Swanson Tom_Swanson at DELL.com
Thu Mar 26 22:28:36 UTC 2015


I just ran it and got ...

Ran: 304 tests in 412.0000 sec.
- Passed: 293
- Skipped: 11

From: Ryan Hsu [mailto:rhsu at vmware.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 4:45 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Deadline For Volume Drivers to Be Readded

Hmm, that's what I thought at first but when I looked at the "What tests do I use" FAQ, the tests that it says to use links to: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tempest/tree/tempest/api/volume, which is exactly what we're running. Even so, I ran the "tox -e all -- volume" command and that just runs 4 more tests.

-Ryan

[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#What_tests_do_I_use.3F

On Mar 26, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Tom Swanson <Tom_Swanson at DELL.com<mailto:Tom_Swanson at DELL.com>> wrote:


You want to run the "volume" tests and not "tempest.api.volume" tests.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Hsu [mailto:rhsu at vmware.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:50 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Deadline For Volume Drivers to Be Readded

Hi Mike,

We (VMware CI) run "testr run tempest.api.volume" for our Cinder CI and this runs about ~240 tests for us. I'm guessing that the rest of the ~60 tests are not being run due to skips and disabled features. For example, here is a sampling of tests that are skipped in a recent run (note that this is using tempest.conf with no explicit disabling of Cinder services):

tempest.api.compute.test_live_block_migration.LiveBlockMigrationTestJSON.test_iscsi_volume ... SKIPPED: Block Live migration not available setUpClass (tempest.api.orchestration.stacks.test_volumes.CinderResourcesTest) ... SKIPPED: Heat support is required setUpClass (tempest.api.volume.admin.test_multi_backend.VolumeMultiBackendV2Test) ... SKIPPED: Cinder multi-backend feature disabled tempest.api.compute.volumes.test_attach_volume.AttachVolumeTestJSON.test_attach_detach_volume ... SKIPPED: SSH required for this test setUpClass (tempest.api.volume.admin.test_volumes_backup.VolumesBackupsV1Test) ... SKIPPED: Cinder backup feature disabled setUpClass (tempest.api.volume.admin.test_volumes_backup.VolumesBackupsV2Test) ... SKIPPED: Cinder backup feature disabled setUpClass (tempest.api.volume.admin.test_multi_backend.VolumeMultiBackendV1Test) ... SKIPPED: Cinder multi-backend feature disabled tempest.scenario.test_volume_boot_pattern.TestVolumeBootPattern.test_volume_boot_pattern
 ... SKIPPED: Skipped until Bug: 1373513 is resolved.
tempest.scenario.test_stamp_pattern.TestStampPattern.test_stamp_pattern ... SKIPPED: Skipped until Bug: 1205344 is resolved.
setUpClass (tempest.thirdparty.boto.test_ec2_instance_run.InstanceRunTest) ... SKIPPED: The EC2 API is not available setUpClass (tempest.thirdparty.boto.test_ec2_volumes.EC2VolumesTest) ... SKIPPED: The EC2 API is not available tempest.scenario.test_volume_boot_pattern.TestVolumeBootPatternV2.test_volume_boot_pattern ... SKIPPED: Skipped until Bug: 1373513 is resolved.

As we are actually running the volume suite according to the FAQ and the above skipped tests are documented by our CI, would it be possible to add an exception to the rule?  I'm sure these numbers will be different for all CIs and as long as people are not abusing and hiding skipped tests, I don't see this as a problem.

Thanks,
Ryan

On Mar 26, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Mike Perez <thingee at gmail.com<mailto:thingee at gmail.com>> wrote:


As discussed in the last Cinder meeting [1], in order to have your
volume driver readded into the Kilo release, you must have a CI
reporting and stable for five days prior to 4/6.

This includes:

1) Providing logs to screen sessions, etc configs, tempest output [2].
2) You should be running around 304 tests if you're following instructions from
 the Cinder third party wiki [3]. If you're running less than that, your CI
 will be *NOT* be considered satisfactory for skipping tests.

I will also be emailing individuals who have already asked for
exceptions, just to make sure communication was clear.


[1] -
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-25-
16.00.log.html#l-173 [2] -
http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#requirements
[3] -
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#What_te
sts_do_I_use.3F

--
Mike Perez

______________________________________________________________________
____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<mailto:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<mailto:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150326/021db54b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list