Open Stack

It is huawei-volume-ci that is on behalf of huawei 18000 iSCSI and huawei 18000 FC driver, not huawei-ci. I am sorry for these two ci names so similar.

And I think the point is: Does the requirement is really "a stable CI", and if one CI is not stable, can it make a exemption like NetApp FC drivers?
I think this is the point.

Thanks,
Liu

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Mike Perez [mailto:thingee at gmail.com] 
发送时间: 2015年3月21日 2:28
收件人: jsbryant at electronicjungle.net; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] May you reconsider about huawei driver?

On 09:41 Fri 20 Mar     , Jay S. Bryant wrote:
> Mike,
> 
> Looks like this removal may have been a mistake.  We should readdress.

This was not a mistake. As Walt has mentioned that CI run failed anyways. Also if you take a look at Huawei's CI reporting history, it's not that often AND not reliable [1].

This is not satisfactory meeting the requirements. If we're saying they're having networking issues from January to now, this really sounds like to me it was *not* a priority.

[1] - https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:+huawei-ci+project:openstack/cinder,n,z

--
Mike Perez

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev