Open Stack

On 03/06/2015 10:44 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 03/06/2015 12:37 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
>> On 05/03/15 19:49, Adam Young wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to drop port 5000 all-together, as we are using a port 
>>> assigned
>>> to a different service.  35357 is also problematic as it is in the
>>> middle of the Ephemeral range.  Since we are  talking about running
>>> everything in one web server anywya, using port 80/443 for all web 
>>> stuff
>>> is the right approach.
>> I have thought about this as well. The issue here is, URLs for keystone
>> and horizon will probably clash.
>> (is https://server/api/... a keystone or a call for horizon).
>>
>> No matter what we do in devstack, this is something, horizon and
>> keystone devs need to fix first. E.g. in Horizon, we still discover hard
>> coded URLs here and there. To catch that kind of things, I had a patch
>> up for review, to easily configure moving Horizon from using http server
>> root to something different.
>>
>> I would expect the same thing for keystone, too.
>
> It's the same thing for almost every project.  I've been working on 
> the puppet-openstack code quite a bit lately, and there are many, many 
> places that assume keystone is listening to http(s)://host:5000/v2.0 
> or host:35357/v2.0.

File them as bugs when you find them.
>
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________ 
>>
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: 
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________ 
>
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev