[openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN-aware VMs meeting
mestery at mestery.com
Mon Jun 15 13:52:24 UTC 2015
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Ildikó Váncsa <ildiko.vancsa at ericsson.com>
> Hi Kyle,
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mestery at mestery.com]
> > Sent: June 15, 2015 04:26
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN-aware VMs meeting
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Ildikó Váncsa <
> ildiko.vancsa at ericsson.com>
> > wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Since we reopened the review for this blueprint we’ve got a
> > large number of comments. It can be clearly seen that the original
> > has to be changed, although it still requires some discussion to define a
> > reasonable design that provides the desired feature and is aligned with
> > architecture and guidelines of Neutron. In order to speed up the process
> > fit into the Liberty timeframe, we would like to have a discussion about
> > The goal is to discuss the alternatives we have, decide which to go on
> > and sort out the possible issues. After this discussion the blueprint
> will be
> > updated with the desired solution.
> > I would like to propose a time slot for _next Tuesday (06. 16.),
> > 17:00UTC – 18:00UTC_. I would like to have the discussion on the
> > #openstack-neutron channel, that gives a chance to guys who might be
> > interested, but missed this mail to attend. I tried to check the slot,
> but please
> > let me know if it collides with any Neutron related meeting.
> > This looks to be fine. I would suggest that it may make more sense to
> have it
> > in an #openstack-meeting channel, though we can certainly do a free-form
> > chat in #openstack-neutron as well. I think the desired end-goal here
> > be to figure out any remaining nits that are being discussed on the spec
> > we can move forward in Liberty.
> I wasn’t sure that it is a good idea to bring an unscheduled meeting to
> the meeting channels. Is it acceptable to hold an ad-hoc meeting there or
> does it have to be registered somewhere even if it's one occasion? As much
> as I saw the #openstack-meeting-4 channel is available although the list of
> meetings and the .ical file is not in sync, it's not taken in either.
> Should we try it there?
I think as long as there isn't a scheduled meeting in place, we can use the
channel for a one-off meeting. It has the added benefit of being logged in
the same way as other meetings, and we can focus the discussion.
I agree with the desired outcome, so that we can start the implementation
> as soon as possible. I will try to send out an agenda before the meeting
> with the points that we should discuss.
Perfect! I've added a note to the Neutron meeting for tomorrow  to
highlight this. If you get the agenda written, please add a pointer in the
Neutron meeting agenda in the same place.
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> > Thanks,
> > Kyle
> > Thanks and Best Regards,
> > Ildikó
> > _______________________________________________
> > ___________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
> > request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-
> > dev
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev