Open Stack

On 2015-06-08 16:53:21 +0100 (+0100), Dave Walker wrote:
> This breaks the desire of wanting to have a shared version scheme if
> consumers add their own local patches via git.  This works fine for
> consumers that do not use git for handling their local patches, but
> does not support the model of allowing the user to rebase using git.
> 
> Perhaps tags ARE superior for this?

Agreed, even the .devN (or earlier .postN) versioning has the same
issue. If you rely on PBR autoversioning for non-tagged commits then
your local commits _will_ conflict with upstream autoversions.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley