Open Stack

Robert Collins wrote:
> On 6 June 2015 at 08:53, Joshua Harlow<harlowja at outlook.com>  wrote:
>> Hopefully it's somewhat obvious to folks that altering the PBR version
>> schema (yet again), breaks *all the people* from using it in a reliable
>> manner, and if the goal of PBR is to bring reasonableness, well changing it
>> in a way that breaks things seems like the-anti-pattern of PBR.
>>
>> I know from building with anvil and building RPMs that we only used tags in
>> https://github.com/stackforge/anvil/tree/master/conf/origins because the PBR
>> version number would change format/style/other (and also partially because
>> nothing existed that converted to a *sane* rpm version string, although this
>> supposedly exists now via a new PBR function).
>
> Well is has the thing you collaborated on. Whether thats sane, an RPM
> person needs to say :)

Sanity is in the eye of the beholder so +1 from me, hopefully not to 
insane, ha :-P

>
> -Rob
>
>