Open Stack

On 06/05/2015 09:34 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
>> If the downsteam consumer has their own extra patches ontop of the
>> stable branch, then it seems D is even less useful than A.
> 
> It is not - downstream (speaking for RDO) I would keep Version:
> 2015.1.N where N is stable patch# so that we have a common reference
> point with other distros.
> Our patches, if any, then come on top this, so it's clear which
> patches are added by distro.
> 
> Cheers,
> Alan
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
Yes, we use a revbump strategy here for patches and changing
2015.0.0-r10 or something.  I think this is the standard way most
distros signify changes from the base package.

-- 
Matthew Thode

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150605/92e4196f/attachment.pgp>