[openstack-dev] Standard way to indicate a partial blueprint implementation?
chris.friesen at windriver.com
Fri Jun 5 04:57:54 UTC 2015
On 06/04/2015 05:23 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> Ever since we established a format for including metadata about bugs in Git
> commit messages that included a 'Partial-Bug' tag, people have been looking for
> a way to do the equivalent for partial blueprint implementations.
> I have personally been using:
> Implements: partial-blueprint x
> but I don't actually care much. I would also be fine with:
> Partially-Implements: blueprint x
If we need one, second one gets my vote.
I'm not sure we actually need one though. Do we really care about the
distinction between a commit that fully implements a blueprint and one that
partially implements it? I'd expect that most blueprints require multiple
commits, and so "blueprint X" could implicitly be assumed to be a partial
implementation in the common case.
More information about the OpenStack-dev