[openstack-dev] [magnum][blueprint] magnum-service-list

SURO suro.patz at gmail.com
Wed Jul 29 20:02:37 UTC 2015


Hi Jay,

'service'/'pod'/'rc' are conceptual abstraction at magnum level. Yes, 
the abstraction was inspired from the same in kubernetes, but the data 
stored in DB about a 'service' is properly abstracted and not 
k8s-specific at the top level.

If we plan to change this to 'k8s-service-list', the same applies for 
even creation and other actions. This will give rise to COE-specific 
command and concepts and which may proliferate further. Instead, we can 
abstract swarm's service concept under the umbrella of magnum's 
'service' concept without creating k8s-service and swarm-service.

I suggest we should keep the concept/abstraction at Magnum level, as it is.

Regards,
SURO
irc//freenode: suro-patz

On 7/28/15 7:59 PM, Jay Lau wrote:
> Hi Suro,
>
> Sorry for late. IMHO, even the "magnum service-list" is getting data 
> from DB, but the DB is actually persisting some data for Kubernetes 
> service, so my thinking is it possible to change "magnum service-list" 
> to "magnum k8s-service-list", same for pod and rc.
>
> I know this might bring some trouble for backward compatibility issue, 
> not sure if it is good to do such modification at this time. Comments?
>
> Thanks
>
> 2015-07-27 20:12 GMT-04:00 SURO <suro.patz at gmail.com 
> <mailto:suro.patz at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hi all,
>     As we did not hear back further on the requirement of this
>     blueprint, I propose to keep the existing behavior without any
>     modification.
>
>     We would like to explore the decision on this blueprint on our
>     next weekly IRC meeting[1].
>
>     Regards,
>     SURO
>     irc//freenode: suro-patz
>
>     [1] -https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Containers
>
>     2015-07-28 	UTC 2200 Tuesday
>
>       
>
>     On 7/21/15 4:54 PM, SURO wrote:
>>     Hi all, [special attention: Jay Lau] The bp[1] registered, asks
>>     for the following implementation -
>>
>>       * 'magnum service-list' should be similar to 'nova service-list'
>>       * 'magnum service-list' should be moved to be ' magnum
>>         k8s-service-list'. Also similar holds true for
>>         'pod-list'/'rc-list'
>>
>>     As I dug some details, I find -
>>
>>       * 'magnum service-list' fetches data from OpenStack DB[2],
>>         instead of the COE endpoint. So technically it is not
>>         k8s-specific. magnum is serving data for objects modeled as
>>         'service', just the way we are catering for 'magnum
>>         container-list' in case of swarm bay.
>>       * If magnum provides a way to get the COE endpoint details,
>>         users can use native tools to fetch the status of the
>>         COE-specific objects, viz. 'kubectl get services' here.
>>       * nova has lot more backend services, e.g. cert, scheduler,
>>         consoleauth, compute etc. in comparison to magnum's conductor
>>         only. Also, not all the api's have this 'service-list'
>>         available.
>>
>>     With these arguments in view, can we have some more
>>     explanation/clarification in favor of the ask in the blueprint?
>>     [1] -
>>     https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnum/+spec/magnum-service-list
>>     [2] -
>>     https://github.com/openstack/magnum/blob/master/magnum/objects/service.py#L114
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Regards,
>>     SURO
>>     irc//freenode: suro-patz
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Thanks,
>
> Jay Lau (Guangya Liu)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150729/90a2d05e/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list