Open Stack

Bogdan,

Answering your questions, in MOS 7.0 source code heartbeats are enabled by
default (with heartbeat_timeout_threshold value set to 60). We patched our
version of upstream stable/kilo to do so. So, in installed env heartbeats
are enabled for every component except Neutron, for which puppet manifests
explicitly disable heartbeats, as you already noted.

Regarding how should we proceed, right now we are testing how upstream
implementation performs in our environments. I suggest to postpone the
decision until we have enough data.

Thanks,

Dmitry

2015-07-28 12:06 GMT+03:00 Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobrelia at mirantis.com>:

> Folks, it seems the situation with Kilo support for RabbitMQ heartbeats
> should be elaborated.
> There is a bug [0] and a ML [1] related. The questions are:
>
> a) Should Fuel 7.0 with Kilo *explicitly* disable via puppet the
> upstream implementation of heartbeats for all OpenStack components
> (Neutron example [2]) and keep the MOS specific implementation of
> heartbeats configured the same way as it was for Juno?
>
> b) Or should we change nothing additionally allowing Oslo defaults for
> Kilo being populated for heartbeats settings out of box? Related
> question - what are upstream heartbeat defaults in MOS, do they differ
> to upstream ones?
>
> [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1477689
> [1]
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-July/068751.html
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/194381/
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bogdan Dobrelya,
> Irc #bogdando
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150728/ecc683ad/attachment.html>