[openstack-dev] [fuel] [FFE] FF Exception request for Deploy nova-compute (VCDriver) feature

Vladimir Kuklin vkuklin at mirantis.com
Mon Jul 27 11:38:18 UTC 2015


There is a slight change needed, e.g. fixing of noop tests. Then we can
merge it and accept for FFE, I think.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Andrian Noga <anoga at mirantis.com> wrote:

> Colleagues,
> actually, i'm tottaly agree with Mike. We can merge
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196114/ w/o additional Ceilometer
> support (will be moved to next release). So if we merge it today we dont
> need FFE for this feature.
>
>
> Regards,
> Andrian
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Mike Scherbakov <mscherbakov at mirantis.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Since we are in FF state already, I'd like to have urgent estimate from
>> one of fuel-library cores:
>> - holser
>> - alex_didenko
>> - aglarendil
>> - bogdando
>>
>> aglarendil is on vacation though. Guys, please take a look at
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196114/ - can we accept it as
>> exception? Seems to be good to go...
>>
>> I still think that additional Ceilometer support should be moved to the
>> next release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:56 PM Mike Scherbakov <mscherbakov at mirantis.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrian,
>>> this is High priority blueprint [1] for 7.0 timeframe. It seems we still
>>> didn't merge the main part [2], and need FF exception for additional stuff.
>>>
>>> The question is about quality. If we focus on enhancements, then we
>>> don't focus on bugs. Which whether means to deliver work with lower quality
>>> of slip the release.
>>>
>>> My opinion is rather don't give FF exception in this case, and don't
>>> have Ceilometer support for this new feature.
>>>
>>> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/compute-vmware-role
>>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196114/
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:39 PM Andrian Noga <anoga at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The patch patch for fuel-library
>>>> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196114/>  that implements
>>>> 'compute-vwmare' role (https://mirantis.jira.com/browse/PROD-627) requires
>>>> additional work to do (ceilometer support.), but as far as I can see it
>>>> doesn't affect any other parts of the product.
>>>>
>>>> We plan to implement it in 3 working days (2 for implementation, 1 day
>>>> for writing system test and test runs), it should not be hard since we
>>>> already support ceilometer compute agent deployment on controller
>>>> nodes.
>>>>
>>>> We need 1 DevOps engineer and 1 QA engineer to be engaged for this work.
>>>>
>>>> So I think it's ok to accept this feature as an exception for feature
>>>> freeze.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Andrian Noga
>>>> Project manager
>>>> Partner Centric Engineering
>>>> Mirantis, Inc
>>>>
>>>> Mob.phone: +38 (063) 966-21-24
>>>>
>>>> Email: anoga at mirantis.com
>>>> Skype: bigfoot_ua
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Mike Scherbakov
>>> #mihgen
>>>
>> --
>> Mike Scherbakov
>> #mihgen
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Regards,
> Andrian
> Mirantis, Inc
>
> Mob.phone: +38 (063) 966-21-24
> Email: anoga at mirantis.com
> Skype: bigfoot_ua
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Yours Faithfully,
Vladimir Kuklin,
Fuel Library Tech Lead,
Mirantis, Inc.
+7 (495) 640-49-04
+7 (926) 702-39-68
Skype kuklinvv
35bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str.
Moscow, Russia,
www.mirantis.com <http://www.mirantis.ru/>
www.mirantis.ru
vkuklin at mirantis.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150727/2c84c8db/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list