[openstack-dev] [fuel] FF Exception request for Templates for Networking feature
ikalnitsky at mirantis.com
Fri Jul 24 09:02:02 UTC 2015
The issue  looks like a feature to me. I'd move it to next release.
Let's focus on what's important right now - stability.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Evgeniy L <eli at mirantis.com> wrote:
> Since the feature is essential, and changes are small, we can accept it as
> feature freeze exceptions.
> But as far as I know there is a very important ticket  which was created
> order to get patches merged faster, also I still have concerns regarding to
> ERB style template "<% if3 %>" which is in fact Jinja. So it's not only
> fixes in the client.
>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1476779
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Mike Scherbakov <mscherbakov at mirantis.com>
>> Looks like the only CLI part left:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204321/, and you guys did a great job
>> finishing the other two.
>> Looks like we'd need to give FF exception, as this is essential feature.
>> It's glad that we merged all other thousands lines of code. This is the most
>> complex feature, and seems like the only small thing is left.
>> I'd like to hear feedback from Nailgun cores & fuel client SMEs. For me,
>> it seems it is lower risk, and patch is relatively small. How long would it
>> take to complete it? If it takes a couple of days, then it is fine. If it is
>> going to take week or two, then we will have to have it as a risk for HCF
>> deadline. Spending resources on features now, not on bugs, means less
>> quality or slip of the release.
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:36 PM Aleksey Kasatkin <akasatkin at mirantis.com>
>>> I would like to request an exception from the Feature Freeze for
>>> "Templates for Networking" feature .
>>> Exception is required for two CRs to python-fuelclient: , and one
>>> CR to fuel-web (Nailgun): .
>>> These CRs are for adding ability to create/remove networks via API 
>>> and for supporting new API functionality via CLI.
>>> These patchsets are for adding new templates-related functionality and
>>> they do not change existing functionality.
>>> Patchsets , are in deep review and they will hopefully be merged on
>>> Please, respond if you have any questions or concerns related to this
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/templates-for-networking
>>>  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204321/
>>>  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203602/
>>>  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201217/
>>> Best regards,
>>> Aleksey Kasatkin
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> Mike Scherbakov
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
More information about the OpenStack-dev