[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Specs process query

Matt Keenan matt.keenan at oracle.com
Mon Jul 20 12:27:48 UTC 2015


On 07/06/15 23:19, Ruby Loo wrote:
> On 1 July 2015 at 08:25, Matt Keenan <matt.keenan at oracle.com
> <mailto:matt.keenan at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     In submitting my first ironic spec, I am following the process
>     outlined at:
>     https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ironic/Specs_Process
>
>     As of Kilo this suggests we also follow:
>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August/041960.html
>
>     This indicates that once a spec is registered before submission of
>     the spec text the registered spec needs to be given the ok.
>
>     Quick discussion on IRC indicates that this was never adhered to. If
>     it's not going to be adhered to then I'd suggest removing this
>     reference from Specs_Process.
>
>     cheers
>
>     Matt
>
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> My interpretation of the email you referenced, was to help 'fast-track'
> two things: 1. new 'features' that didn't require a spec to be written
> and 2. new 'features' that are out of scope or something that just won't
> work for whatever reason.
>
> I believe it may be true (although I haven't read all the proposed
> specs) that no one has actually followed that process, but I don't know
> if that means we should not provide that as a choice. Are you
> interpreting it as 'You must follow this process' as opposed to 'You
> could choose to follow this process'?

My interpretation was "You must follow this process", but if it's 
optional then not an issue I guess.

cheers

Matt

>
> --ruby
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list