[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Separate repo for Fuel Agent

Vladimir Kozhukalov vkozhukalov at mirantis.com
Fri Jul 10 17:14:13 UTC 2015


Ok, guys.

Looks like there are no any objections. At the moment I need to create
actual version of upstream repository which is going to be sucked in by
OpenStack Infra. Please, be informed that all patches changing
fuel-web/fuel_agent that will be merged after this moment will need to be
ported into the new fuel-agent repository.


Vladimir Kozhukalov

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
vkozhukalov at mirantis.com> wrote:

> Guys, we are next to moving fuel_agent directory into a separate
> repository. Action flow is going to be as follows:
>
> 1) Create verify jobs on our CI https://review.fuel-infra.org/#/c/9186
> (DONE)
> 2) Freeze fuel_agent directory in https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-web
> (will announce in a separate mail thread). That means we stop merging
> patches into master which change fuel_agent directory. Unfortunately, all
> review requests need to be re-sent, but it is not going to be very
> difficult.
> 3) Create temporary upstream repository with fuel_agent/* as a content.
> I'm not planning to move 5.x and 6.x branches. Only master. So, all fixes
> for 5.x and 6.x will be living in fuel-web.
> 4) This upstream repository is going to be sucked in by openstack-infra.
> Patch is here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/199178/ (review is
> welcome) I don't know how long it is going to take. Will try to poke infra
> people to do this today.
> 5) Then we need to accept two patches into new fuel-agent repository:
>  - rpm spec (extraction from fuel-web/specs/nailgun.spec) (ready, but
> there is no review request)
>  - run_tests.sh (to run tests) (ready, but there is no review request)
>
> !!! By this moment there won't be any impact on ISO build process !!!
>
> 6) Then we need to change two things at the same time (review is welcome)
>   - fuel-web/specs/nailgun.spec in order to prevent fuel-agent package
> building  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200595
>   - fuel-main so as to introduce new fuel-agent repository into the build
> process https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200025
>
> And good luck to me -)
>
>
> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
> vkozhukalov at mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> There were some questions from Alexandra Fedorova about independent
>> release cycle.
>>
>> >according to the configuration [1] Infra team won't be able to do
>> >branching or any kind of release management for new repository.
>>
>> >Could you please clarify, do we plan to version new repository the
>> >same way as we do for main fuel repositories or there going to be
>> >separate releases as in python-fuelclient [2]? Who should drive the
>> >release process for this repo and how this change will affect Fuel ISO
>> >release?
>>
>> >[1]
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/199178/1/gerrit/acls/stackforge/fuel-agent.config,cm
>> >[2]
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-July/068837.html
>>
>> IMO all Fuel components should be as much independent as possible with
>> highly defined APIs used for their interaction, with their own teams, with
>> their own independent release cycles. But we cannot switch to this model
>> immediately. For the start, we can just move those components into separate
>> repositories, leaving the same access rights and core team as we have for
>> fuel-web.
>>
>> When Fuel Agent is a separate repository we discuss team. It looks like a
>> team leader is the best person to manage releases for a particular
>> component. This thread is totally about separation stuff and how to do this
>> not breaking anything.
>>
>>
>>
>> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
>> vkozhukalov at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear colleagues,
>>>
>>> I am going to move Fuel Agent into a separate git repository. The thing
>>> is that we have quite a few review requests to fuel-web with changes for
>>> Fuel Agent. The new repository is going to look like this
>>> https://github.com/kozhukalov/fuel-agent i.e. there is no additional
>>> sub-directory fuel_agent. In fact, I don't think it is a big deal to update
>>> all fuel agent related review requests.
>>>
>>> Work items:
>>> 0) request to openstack-infra https://review.openstack.org/#/c/199178/1
>>> 0.1) upstream for this request with commit history
>>> https://github.com/kozhukalov/fuel-agent
>>> 1) fuel-agent/specs/fuel-agent.spec is an extraction from
>>> fuel-web/specs/nailgun.spec (separate commit, in progress)
>>> 2) modify fuel-main to build fuel-agent package (in progress)
>>> 3) create jenkins-jobs/servers/fuel-ci/verify-fuel-agent.yaml (in
>>> progress)
>>>
>>> For the start Fuel Agent core team will be the same as in fuel-web.
>>>
>>> If there is anything I forgot, please remind me about that.
>>>
>>> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150710/7d0ecdf7/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list