[openstack-dev] [neutron] Plethora of dbase migration questions...

Paul Michali pc at michali.net
Tue Jul 7 17:28:51 UTC 2015


HEAD, head, 24f28869838b (my new file) all say the same thing. :(


On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:34 PM Salvatore Orlando <sorlando at nicira.com>
wrote:

> possibly I was wrong in mixing up git & alembic.
> It should be "upgrade head" - lowercase.
>
> If that doesn't work there might some other issue lurking.
>
> Salvatore
>
> On 7 July 2015 at 17:44, Paul Michali <pc at michali.net> wrote:
>
>> Salvatore,
>>
>> I changed head to the version before my new one, and then tried to
>> upgrade and I see this:
>>  neutron-db-manage --config-file /opt/stack/neutron/etc/neutron.conf
>> --service vpnaas upgrade HEAD
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/local/bin/neutron-db-manage", line 10, in <module>
>>     sys.exit(main())
>>   File "/opt/stack/neutron/neutron/db/migration/cli.py", line 238, in main
>>     CONF.command.func(config, CONF.command.name)
>>   File "/opt/stack/neutron/neutron/db/migration/cli.py", line 105, in
>> do_upgrade
>>     run_sanity_checks(config, revision)
>>   File "/opt/stack/neutron/neutron/db/migration/cli.py", line 229, in
>> run_sanity_checks
>>     script_dir.run_env()
>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/alembic/script.py", line
>> 390, in run_env
>>     util.load_python_file(self.dir, 'env.py')
>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/alembic/util.py", line
>> 243, in load_python_file
>>     module = load_module_py(module_id, path)
>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/alembic/compat.py", line
>> 79, in load_module_py
>>     mod = imp.load_source(module_id, path, fp)
>>   File
>> "/opt/stack/neutron-vpnaas/neutron_vpnaas/db/migration/alembic_migrations/env.py",
>> line 86, in <module>
>>     run_migrations_online()
>>   File
>> "/opt/stack/neutron-vpnaas/neutron_vpnaas/db/migration/alembic_migrations/env.py",
>> line 67, in run_migrations_online
>>     engine = session.create_engine(neutron_config.database.connection)
>>   File
>> "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/oslo_db/sqlalchemy/engines.py",
>> line 112, in create_engine
>>     url = sqlalchemy.engine.url.make_url(sql_connection)
>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/url.py",
>> line 186, in make_url
>>     return _parse_rfc1738_args(name_or_url)
>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sqlalchemy/engine/url.py",
>> line 235, in _parse_rfc1738_args
>>     "Could not parse rfc1738 URL from string '%s'" % name)
>> sqlalchemy.exc.ArgumentError: Could not parse rfc1738 URL from string ''
>>
>> Any ideas what is wrong here?
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:05 AM Paul Michali <pc at michali.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I wasn't using the --service option, so I suspect that is why my
>>> down_version was wrong.  In talking with Akihiro, I added a check to PEP8
>>> and made sure that it fails if head is wrong. It is:
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/199082/ (of course that failed py27 -
>>> I've got to see if there was some recent breakage in vpn repo, again).
>>>
>>> Regarding the migration, one of the new columns may be None, but there
>>> must be at least one IP version entry (there is an existing test in VPN for
>>> using a router w/o an external IP set). Since the new code will rely on
>>> these new fields, I'd like to populate them as part of the migration. I
>>> think it would be more complicated to handle during operation.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have examples of how to do queries of objects, from the
>>> migration upgrade() code?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> PCM
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:02 AM Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2015-07-07 21:39 GMT+09:00 Henry Gessau <gessau at cisco.com>:
>>>>
>>>>>  On Tue, Jul 07, 2015, Paul Michali <pc at michali.net> <pc at michali.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Salvatore for the responses. See @PCM in-line...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:14 AM Salvatore Orlando <sorlando at nicira.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Some comments inline.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Salvatore
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    On 6 July 2015 at 20:00, Paul Michali < <pc at michali.net>
>>>>>> pc at michali.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  I have some urgent requests about migration that I'm hoping to get
>>>>>>> some info on. I'm working on a bug where I need to add two (related) fields
>>>>>>> to a table for VPNaaS. Here's the objectives related to migration...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  1) create local_v4_ip and lcoal_v6_ip fields in the vpnservice
>>>>>>> table
>>>>>>> 2) for each entry in the vpnservice table:
>>>>>>>     2.1) Get the router.gw_port.fixed_ips list
>>>>>>>     2.2) Determine the version of each fixed IP and store the first
>>>>>>> of each version (if any) into the appropriate new field.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  I have created a migration file, and I changed the down_revision
>>>>>>> to be the number of the revision that is the first in the migration chain
>>>>>>> in the VPN repo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Here are the many questions I have...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  When I look in the VPN repo, the HEAD file has the version 'kilo',
>>>>>>> which is not the current head.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Shouldn't it the version number of the first file in the migration
>>>>>>> chain?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      It should indeed. How are you generating the revision script?
>>>>>> Using neutron-db-manage it should be updated automatically [1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  @PCM I ran neutron-db-manage, when in the neutron repo, and it
>>>>> assigned some version, but it was not the latest in the neutron-vpnaas repo.
>>>>>
>>>>> neutron-db-manage does not handle alembic branches in separate repos
>>>>> very well at all yet. I am working on updating it with
>>>>> <https://review.openstack.org/198524>
>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/198524 but I have quite a lot left to do.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, at now we have implicit order of running alembic migrations.
>>>> First run neutron db migration and then advanced service migrations.
>>>>
>>>> I do not fully understand how alembic branch mechanism works, but
>>>> I think we can have a common ancestor and have multiple branches,
>>>> and each branch can evolve independently.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  I checked the VPN repo and there were a chain of versions, which I
>>>>> used to determine what the head should be and have set the version
>>>>> accordingly. However, in the current repo, head is set to "kilo", which
>>>>> appears to be incorrect.  The versions are:
>>>>>
>>>>>  56893333aa52
>>>>> kilo   <<< HEAD
>>>>> 3ea02b2a773e
>>>>> start_neutron_vpnaas
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>> Ouch. That is an error, because <https://review.openstack.org/190569>
>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/190569 should have updated HEAD but
>>>>> didn't.
>>>>>
>>>>> The version sequence (you can see it in any devstack run) is:
>>>>>
>>>>> INFO  [alembic.migration] Running upgrade  -> start_neutron_vpnaas,
>>>>> start neutron-vpnaas chain
>>>>> INFO  [alembic.migration] Running upgrade start_neutron_vpnaas ->
>>>>> 3ea02b2a773e, add_index_tenant_id
>>>>> INFO  [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 3ea02b2a773e -> kilo, kilo
>>>>> INFO  [alembic.migration] Running upgrade kilo -> 56893333aa52, fix
>>>>> identifier map fk
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It seems we don't have an appropriate check for HEAD revision in at
>>>> least VPNaaS repo.
>>>> Paul and I just discussed it. We need to improve the check too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Should I do a separate commit that fixes the HEAD file, or just fix it
>>>>> as part of the bug fix I'm working on.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, you should immediately submit a patch to change HEAD to
>>>>> 56893333aa52.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  BTW, at one point, after having correctly set the HEAD and versions
>>>>> in my new migration file, I think I ran neutron-db-manage check_migration,
>>>>> and I think it set the HEAD to my version, but it did that in the neutron
>>>>> repo, and not the VPN repo.  I might have been running from the wrong repo?
>>>>>
>>>>> I working on updating the devref docs for this process. Things have
>>>>> changed quite a bit with the alembic branches in separate repos.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>   For my commit, I'm assuming I change the HEAD file to use my
>>>>>>> migration file's version?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      You can do that manually too, yes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  I set HEAD to my migration file, and my file has a down revision
>>>>>>> of the previous head's revision. If I run 'neutron-db-manage --config-file
>>>>>>> ../neutron/etc/neutron.conf --config-file
>>>>>>> ../neutron/etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/ml2_conf.ini check_migration' there is
>>>>>>> no output so I guess that is OK.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  As I develop my new migration file, is there a way that I can test
>>>>>>> it (running neutron-db-migration, maybe)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      When I test migrations I usually dump the database, run the
>>>>>> migration with neutron-db-manage upgrade HEAD (I think it's not necessary
>>>>>> to specify HEAD), and restore the db from the dump if the migration fails.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Is there a way to run the migration file under the debugger, as
>>>>>>> well (importing pdb, for example)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      The migration process is just like any python application, so I
>>>>>> guess you can debug it with pdb.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  @PCM Ah, so use "neutron-db-manage upgrade HEAD". That was the piece
>>>>> that was missing. I take it there are no specific unit tests of the
>>>>> migration files?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  In the migration, I can add the columns needed. What's the best
>>>>>>> way to fill out those fields - using raw SQL queries or create a Session
>>>>>>> object and access the VpnService object's router object?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      If the default value for the column is not enough, and you need
>>>>>> to specify a value which depends on other values in the same row I would
>>>>>> prefer plain SQL statements, but if that become cumbersome I guess it's ok
>>>>>> to use sqlalchemy's session.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  I see there is some op.bind() call and then engine.execute(), but
>>>>>>> could use some help on the best way to extract the needed queries (I need
>>>>>>> to access the vpnservice's router, and then access the (Port) gw_port
>>>>>>> relationship, and from that access the (IPAllocation) fixed_ips list).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Perhaps you can point us to the review pages on gerrit, and we
>>>>>> can provide detailed comments there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  @PCM Yeah, I haven't pushed it up yet. I have a few more changes to
>>>>> make, and should be able to get it up in a few days. The LP bug is 1464387.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Essentially, in the vpnservices table, I'm adding an IPv4 and/or
>>>>> IPv6 addresses for the  "local" end of VPN connections that will be
>>>>> established. This is to allow alternative VPN implementation (appliances,
>>>>> separate S/W, H/W, VM based VPN, etc) to specify addresses different than
>>>>> what is available on the Neutron router.
>>>>>
>>>>>  However, for the reference implementation, we'll use the Neutron
>>>>> router's fixed_ips list (as is done today), and to handle the migration,
>>>>> I'm thinking the following is needed:
>>>>>
>>>>>  1) create the new columns.
>>>>> 2) Identify the router for that service and obtain it's GW fixed_ips
>>>>> list.
>>>>> 3) Pick first IPv4 address (if any) and IPv6 address (if any), and
>>>>> store in new columns.
>>>>>
>>>>>  So I need to form a query and code to do this.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Appreciate any advise here on how to debug the migration stuff...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Paul Michali (pc_m)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      [1]
>>>>>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron/tree/neutron/db/migration/cli.py#n124
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150707/f13ba4e4/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list