Open Stack

On 6 July 2015 at 13:13, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:

> On 2015-07-06 11:54:45 -0700 (-0700), Armando M. wrote:
> [...]
> > For what I can tell, Joe was kind to set the infra to start
> > gathering data on the reliability of the multi-node jobs, but they
> > are clearly flaky [1], and currently broken.
> [...]
>
> Well, a check-.* pass rate of 25% is likely explained by running
> against proposed bad changes (after all these are running in the
> check pipeline, not the gate). The recent 100% failure we think will
> be fixed with a new release of glean incorporating
> https://review.openstack.org/198576 since we recently started
> exceeding the 64-byte HOST_NAME_MAX on our test platforms.
>

Thanks for the heads-up, Jeremy. That said, the rate is still remarkably
higher as a like-for-like comparison. I don't think we have a way to
compare the rate on the gate pipeline, if I am not mistaken, but that's
besides the point of my attempt at reviving this discussion.

Cheers,
Armando


> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150706/ac0d74bd/attachment.html>