[openstack-dev] [devstack] Use devstack/master to install older releases
jordan.pittier at scality.com
Wed Jul 1 08:16:48 UTC 2015
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Dean Troyer <dtroyer at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Emmanuel Cazenave <contact at emcaz.fr>
>> My first approach was to use devstack/icehouse to install swift/icehouse,
>> devstack/juno for swift/juno, etc....
> This is the only approach that is sane...
>> I am now trying to use devstack/master in every cases because I need this
>> : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115307/ which allow not to install
>> nova+glance which I don't need at all, and whose installation takes a
>> really long time.
> We would probably consider a backport of that to DevStack Juno, but
> Icehouse is effectively EOL and we will be removing that branch soon (days
> or weeks, not months).
I've proposed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197464/ to backport that
patch to Juno.
>> Is my use case of installing older releases with devstack/master not
>> supported ?
> No. Even on master you may have issues trying to run a early cycle
> project with a late-cycle DevStack. DevStack evolves to meet the needs of
> the projects as they develop.
> That Tempest fix is pretty straightforward, with only the one code block
> move not being a "skip this if project is not enabled" check. With
> Icehouse EOL, there will be no additional updates so maintaining that
> backport in a local private branch should not be a big deal. You will need
> that anyway to keep using icehouse after we remove that branch from the
> DevStack repo.
> Dean Troyer
> dtroyer at gmail.com
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev