Open Stack

Regarding the list of attendees and their schedule constraints, it seems
that:
25-26-27 of January would work for everyone.

Please let me know if that's not the case.

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 11/24/2015 05:41 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > If you're involved in Puppet OpenStack or if you want to be involved,
> > please look at this poll: http://goo.gl/forms/lsBf55Ru8L
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your time,
>
> So we got 18 people interested by participating to a Puppet midcycle.
> The output was:
> * People are interested by a midcycle
> * People don't want to do a second physical midcycle (after OPS)
> * Some people can't go at OPS midcycle and can only attend virtual
> midcycle.
>
> I think we should let a chance to anyone to participate and I don't
> believe a physical + virtual midcycle would work.
> So I propose to organize a virtual midcycle in January.
>
> Please look at the etherpad [1], write your name if you want to
> participate and your schedule constraints so we can find the best slot
> for everyone.
>
> Also feel free to propose topics.
>
> Looking forward to see you there,
>
> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-happy-new-year-2016
> --
> Emilien Macchi
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Emilien Macchi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151224/f3c76af5/attachment.html>