[openstack-dev] [cinder] Custom fields for versioned objects

Michał Dulko michal.dulko at intel.com
Tue Dec 15 15:46:02 UTC 2015


On 12/15/2015 04:08 PM, Ryan Rossiter wrote:
> Thanks for the review Michal! As for the bp/bug report, there’s four options:
>
> 1. Tack the work on as part of bp cinder-objects
> 2. Make a new blueprint (bp cinder—object-fields)
> 3. Open a bug to handle all changes for enums/fields
> 4. Open a bug for each changed enum/field
>
> Personally, I’m partial to #1, but #2 is better if you want to track this work separately from the other objects work. I don’t think we should go with bug reports because #3 will be a lot of Partial-Bug and #4 will be kinda spammy. I don’t know what the spec process is in Cinder compared to Nova, but this is nowhere near enough work to be spec-worthy.
>
> If this is something you or others think should be discussed in a meeting, I can tack it on to the agenda for tomorrow.

bp/cinder-object topic is a little crowded with patches and it tracks
mostly rolling-upgrades-related stuff. This is more of a refactoring
than a ovo essential change, so simple specless bp/cinder-object-fields
is totally fine to me.



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list