[openstack-dev] [Fuel] PostgreSQL 9.3 and JSON operations

Aleksandr Didenko adidenko at mirantis.com
Mon Dec 14 13:47:17 UTC 2015


Hi,

> Downgrading for no reason could bring us to big trouble and bad user
experience

+1 to this. Let's keep PostgreSQL 9.3.

Regards,
Alex

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Artem Silenkov <asilenkov at mirantis.com>
wrote:

> Hello!
>
> Vote for update.
>
> 1. We have already shipped 9.3 in fuel-7.0. Downgrading such complicated
> package without any reason is not good thing at all. User experience could
> suffer a lot.
> 2. The next reason is tests. We have tested only 9.3, 9.2 was not tested
> at all. I'm sure we could bring serious regressions by downgrading,
> 3. Postgres-9.3 is not custom. It was taken from KOJI packages and
> backported without any modification. It means that this package is
> officially tested and supported by Fedora, which is good.
> 4. One shipped package more is not a huge burden for us. It was officially
> backported from official sources, tested and suits our need perfectly. Why
> do we need to play such dangerous games downgrading for no reasons?
>
> Let me notice that all packages are maintained by mos-packaging team now
> And we are perfectly ok with postgres-9.3.
>
> Downgrading for no reason could bring us to big trouble and bad user
> experience.
>
> Regards,
> Artem Silenkov
> ---
> MOs-Packaging
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski <
> bpiotrowski at mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2015-12-14 13:12, Igor Kalnitsky wrote:
>> > My opinion here is that I don't like that we're going to build and
>> > maintain one more custom package (just take a look at this patch [4]
>> > if you don't believe me), but I'd like to hear more opinion here.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Igor
>> >
>> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1523544
>> > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249656/
>> > [3] http://goo.gl/forms/Hk1xolKVP0
>> > [4] https://review.fuel-infra.org/#/c/14623/
>> >
>> >
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>>
>> I also think we should stay with what CentOS provides. Increasing
>> maintenance burden for something that can be implemented without bells
>> and whistles sounds like a no-go.
>>
>> Bartłomiej
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151214/b9f8264a/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list