[openstack-dev] [Neutron][DVR]

Ryan Moats rmoats at us.ibm.com
Mon Dec 7 13:41:50 UTC 2015

"Armando M." <armamig at gmail.com> wrote on 12/04/2015 03:43:29 PM:

> From: "Armando M." <armamig at gmail.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 12/04/2015 03:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][DVR]
> > On 4 December 2015 at 05:56, Ryan Moats <rmoats at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > I pretty much agree with Oleg here - I'm not sure an additional tag
> > for defects is needed.
> > The idea of a DvrImpact in the commit message is interesting, but
> > I'm not entirely convinced - if we
> > do it for one sub-project, do we need to do it for all sub-projects
> > and then what does that turn into?
> What does this mean? No other project should care about this. DVR is
> a core feature.

I'm trying to understand if (at its logical conclusion) we end up with
commit tags for all features (i.e. RbacImpact, BareMetalImpact, DbImpact,
etc.) and what that would do to the commit message...

Ryan Moats (regXboi)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151207/733a97b6/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list