Open Stack

Hey Dmitry,

I'm ok with FFE till Tuesday. Moreover, it makes sense to do so in
order to reduce affection on CentOS 7 patches.

- Igor

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Dmitry Klenov <dklenov at mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Let me clarify the situation with Ubuntu bootstrap feature.
>
> First of all, I would like to highlight that all functional commits for this
> feature were merged. This means that starting from yesterday everyone has an
> ability to switch to Ubuntu-based bootstrap manually and start using it. So
> I do not see the risk in loosing testing cycles in the community.
>
> The item which brought concerns on today status meeting was the enablement
> of the feature by default. To do it, 2 patches have to be merged together:
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/250662/ - main switch.
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251908/ - compatibility commit to QA
> suite to comply with new bootstrap config format.
>
> I would like to raise the question if we can have a feature freeze exception
> for these 2 patches?
>
> There are a couple of reasons why I consider it safer to merge these patches
> several days later:
> * There is a bug caught today which will block the tests to pass if we
> switch to Ubuntu bootstrap by default:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1522406
> * There were concerns that a lot of FF commit merges can bring instability
> to QA suite. So it might be reasonable not to bring one more variable right
> now and to enable ubuntu bootstrap by default when all automated tests are
> stabilized.
>
> I would like to ask engineering and QA leads to express their ideas on this.
>
> Thanks,
> Dmitry.
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>