[openstack-dev] [os-client-config][infra] Proposing adding infra-core to core

Steve Martinelli stevemar at ca.ibm.com
Thu Dec 3 21:37:25 UTC 2015

+1, solid reasoning (surface area that infra hits vs osc), would love to
have the infra-core team onboard


From:	Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com>
To:	"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
            <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Date:	2015/12/03 11:53 AM
Subject:	[openstack-dev] [os-client-config][infra] Proposing adding
            infra-core to core

Hey all,

os-client-config is now in the critical path for Infra's Nodepool,
meaning that there are some places where a bug surfacing in it can take
down the entire CI infrastructure. Infra also uses many more of the
advanced features in clouds.yaml than most other people, so the surface
area that could be tickled is higher than day-to-day use via

While this is unlikely to happen, because it's not a high-volume
changing project, it would still be nice to have a safety valve.

For that reason, and because the os-client-config core group is small in
the first place, I'd like to add the infra-core group as a subgroup to
to os-client-config-core.


OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151203/271ae212/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151203/271ae212/attachment.gif>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list