Nikolay, Do you mean that you will *NOT* use oslo.messaging and use pika directly. I'd strongly discourage that possibility. Few members on the oslo.messaging team are looking at pika library already and are doing a prototype: https://github.com/dukhlov/oslo.messaging/blob/master/oslo_messaging/_drivers/impl_pika.py If you are interested in that effort, please let us know. Thanks, Dims On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Nikolay Makhotkin <nmakhotkin at mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi, folks! > > Recently we've had the discussion with oslo.messaging team about > acknowledge feature in RabbitMQ: > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-July/068806.html > > After that Mistral team did the research about using *kombu *or *pika* > library for implementation of remote procedure call server. Both kombu and > pika was met our requirements. But we would prefer to use *pika* by next > reasons: > > 1. It is less complex than *kombu*; > 2. *kombu* itself is abstraction of messaging (but we don't need that); > 3. We had the discussion with one of RabbitMQ developer which advised us > to use *pika* (comparing to *kombu*) > > > Is it possible to add *pika *to the global-requirements for our needs? > > Thanks. > -- > Best Regards, > Nikolay > @ Mirantis Inc. > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150819/cb936d01/attachment.html>