Open Stack

On 04/29/2015 09:19 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2015-04-29 16:46:13 -0700 (-0700), Joe Gordon wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Kyle Mestery <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Russell Bryant <rbryant at redhat.com>
> [...]
>>>> 1) Project governance has moved to a "big tent" model [1].  The vast
>>>> majority of projects that used to be in Stackforge are being folded in
>>>
>> I think the phrase 'vast majority' is misleading, there are still a lot of
>> projects on stackforge.
> [...]
> 
> Even the word "majority" is incorrect, at least for the moment.
> Ignoring openstack-attic and stackforge-attic, of the 627
> non-retired git repositories hosted in our infrastructure, 55% are
> stackforge and 45% are openstack.*.
> 
>     ssh -p 29418 review.openstack.org gerrit ls-projects \
>         |cut -d/ -f1|sort|uniq -c
> 
> The majority (by any sense of the word) are currently still squarely
> stackforge. Once all the chef cookbooks and puppet modules switch
> then the percentages there invert, but I have to agree with Joe that
> it's by no means "vast" even then. If all the fuel repos also move
> then that brings us to a 60/40 split in favor of openstack. Maybe
> that starts to count as vast?
> 
> Regardless, the stackforge/networking-.* repos only make up 3% of
> the total count.

I apologize for the poor choice of words "vast majority".

-- 
Russell Bryant