Open Stack

On 04/22/2015 11:53 AM, Spencer Krum wrote:
> Emillen,
> 
> Do you see shelling out to openstackclient in the keystone test to
> verify that the keystone resources have been created? Do you see trying
> to hit the api from something like aviator? Ultimately I'd like to see
> us spin up an entire openstack in one test then hit it with tempest.

* shell testing: yes because it's the way we wrote our providers.
* aviator: no because we gave up some months ago in favor of using
openstackclient. I'm not in favor of using aviator which would add yet
another dependency and complexity. Maybe I'm wrong though.
* tempest: well... tempest aims to test API features while we only want
to check Keystone is actually running. I think serverspec + some
shelling could help. Having tempest is (to me) overkill and could slow
down our CI if something's wrong in Tempest.

> It may be possible to use a very narrow version of tempest to validate
> just keystone.

Like, only a small set of tests that we would run with testr?

> 
> Thanks,
> Spencer
> 
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com
> <mailto:emilien at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     Some important work is being done on Keystone v3 API support in
>     puppet-keystone.
>     We've clearly seen there is a lack of review and I think we all worry
>     about breaking something.
>     Spencer & I are working on beaker tests lately and the jobs are
>     non-voting for now.
> 
>     I propose:
>     * to review (and eventually merge) the beaker-tests patches [1] [2] for
>     Keystone & openstacklib.
>     * to patch project-config [3] to make vote Beaker jobs in Puppet
>     OpenStack gate for puppet-keystone & puppet-openstacklib. Why voting?
>     Because otherwise I'm not sure people will notice the failure and some
>     patches will be merged while beaker is red.
> 
>     So we can have a good set of tests that will help us to detect some
>     issues in the future.
>     I don't think we will catch all mistakes we can do, but this is a good
>     start.
> 
>     To vote this proposal, you can use the gerrit patches and let any
>     feedback.
> 
>     Thanks,
> 
>     [1] puppet-keystone: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155873/
>     [2] puppet-openstacklib: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176098/
>     [3] project-config: https://review.openstack.org/176343
>     --
>     Emilien Macchi
> 
>     --
> 
>     To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>     send an email to puppet-openstack+unsubscribe at puppetlabs.com
>     <mailto:puppet-openstack%2Bunsubscribe at puppetlabs.com>.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Spencer Krum
> (619)-980-7820
> 
> -- 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to puppet-openstack+unsubscribe at puppetlabs.com
> <mailto:puppet-openstack+unsubscribe at puppetlabs.com>.

-- 
Emilien Macchi

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150422/1b7ed9fd/attachment.pgp>