[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][barbican] default certificate manager

Doug Wiegley dougwig at parksidesoftware.com
Mon Apr 13 21:50:23 UTC 2015


> On Apr 13, 2015, at 3:38 PM, Brandon Logan <brandon.logan at RACKSPACE.COM> wrote:
> 
> I'm of the opinion, which may not be the popular opinion, that barbican is the secret store for openstack.  It is in openstack, it is meant to be used by other openstack services.  v1 lives in the same code base as v2.  Version transitions such as these are going to end up having requirements only for one version.  I don't think think that is a bad thing as v1 will eventually be deprecated.  I am not, however, a packager so I do not know the pains you have nor the perspective.  Sounds like you are okay with leaving it in, which is my preference, but I can obviously be swayed.

And by "eventually", I believe Brandon meant "Liberty".

Thanks,
doug

> 
> Thanks,
> Brandon
> ________________________________________
> From: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 9:40 AM
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][barbican] default certificate manager
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 04/10/2015 09:18 PM, Brandon Logan wrote:
>> Hi Ihar, I'm not against the lazy loading solution, just wondering
>> what the real issue is here.  Is your problem with this that
>> python-barbicanclient needs to be in the requirements.txt?  Or is
>> the problem that v1 will import it even though it isn't used?
>> 
> 
> I package neutron for RDO, so I use requirements.txt as a suggestion.
> My main problem was that python-barbicanclient was not packaged for
> RDO when I started looking into the issue, but now that it's packaged
> in Fedora [1], the issue is not that significant to me. Of course it's
> a wasted dependency installed for nothing (plus its own dependencies),
> but that's not a disaster, and if upstream team thinks it's the right
> thing to do, let it be so, and I'm happy to abandon the change.
> 
> [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208454
> 
> /Ihar
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVK9VFAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57dCkH/R73ECDlHVl2ocBWfTk4BEqi
> R8j/wpCCSz3x9uffWR9F8mJoqEnvekIvTtoaHaleiVfZTAhGRDRoxT7nOuMBFBDp
> ynmeJEicualeiAFX1z6//KA4L6y5hqGaV71axCRmAT/c0P5fuK08WIMBOkzQRyuo
> JmJbej5pOOlDRos0+PJd2+7qxAVU2CAuVBrJIVsJoG4zuISNDalxeOIaYKHU0+Tu
> /r7bztTrjkbcs6jiHrvv8MugsivrV1hGEBDsIVgC/Fsgy19f0X2aEjbh7G6lioab
> Vm6G+fDCFJVVQ6Xbc9qQPs1geRrocVAb7ZGeuhT/RdoMFTxBR8EJnPqWHXkYWuA=
> =O4Ll
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list