[openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron scaling datapoints?

Joshua Harlow harlowja at outlook.com
Sun Apr 12 16:38:20 UTC 2015


Kevin Benton wrote:
> So IIUC tooz would be handling the liveness detection for the agents.
> That would be nice to get ride of that logic in Neutron and just
> register callbacks for rescheduling the dead.
>
> Where does it store that state, does it persist timestamps to the DB
> like Neutron does? If so, how would that scale better? If not, who does
> a given node ask to know if an agent is online or offline when making a
> scheduling decision?

Timestamps are just one way (and likely the most primitive), using redis 
(or memcache) key/value and expiry are another (and letting memcache or 
redis expire using its own internal algorithms), using zookeeper 
ephemeral nodes[1] are another... The point being that its backend 
specific and tooz supports varying backends.

>
> However, before (what I assume is) the large code change to implement
> tooz, I would like to quantify that the heartbeats are actually a
> bottleneck. When I was doing some profiling of them on the master branch
> a few months ago, processing a heartbeat took an order of magnitude less
> time (<50ms) than the 'sync routers' task of the l3 agent (~300ms). A
> few query optimizations might buy us a lot more headroom before we have
> to fall back to large refactors.

Sure, always good to avoid prematurely optimizing things...

Although this is relevant for u I think anyway:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138607/ (same thing/nearly same in nova)...

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172502/ (a WIP implementation of the 
latter).

[1] 
https://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/trunk/zookeeperProgrammers.html#Ephemeral+Nodes

>
> Kevin Benton wrote:
>
>
>     One of the most common is the heartbeat from each agent. However, I
>     don't think we can't eliminate them because they are used to determine
>     if the agents are still alive for scheduling purposes. Did you have
>     something else in mind to determine if an agent is alive?
>
>
> Put each agent in a tooz[1] group; have each agent periodically
> heartbeat[2], have whoever needs to schedule read the active members of
> that group (or use [3] to get notified via a callback), profit...
>
> Pick from your favorite (supporting) driver at:
>
> http://docs.openstack.org/__developer/tooz/compatibility.__html
> <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tooz/compatibility.html>
>
> [1]
> http://docs.openstack.org/__developer/tooz/compatibility.__html#grouping
> <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tooz/compatibility.html#grouping>
> [2]
> https://github.com/openstack/__tooz/blob/0.13.1/tooz/__coordination.py#L315
> <https://github.com/openstack/tooz/blob/0.13.1/tooz/coordination.py#L315>
> [3]
> http://docs.openstack.org/__developer/tooz/tutorial/group___membership.html#watching-__group-changes
> <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tooz/tutorial/group_membership.html#watching-group-changes>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.__openstack.org?subject:__unsubscribe
> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack-dev
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list