[openstack-dev] [all] how to send messages (and events) to our users

Joshua Harlow harlowja at outlook.com
Fri Apr 10 18:55:11 UTC 2015

Ryan Brown wrote:
> On 04/10/2015 01:52 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>> Flavio Percoco wrote:
>>> On 10/04/15 10:00 -0400, Ryan Brown wrote:
>>>> On 04/09/2015 09:40 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
> [snip]
>>>>> Could Zaqar fulfil all of these use case? - Maybe.
>>>> Zaqar as it presently exists, maybe. Zaqar *wants* to fit these cases,
>>>> and they want our feedback if they are missing anything to support
>>>> these.
>>> Yes, please. I'd go a bit further than this and say we're willing to
>>> help on getting this done as that'll be one of the things the team
>>> will focus on in the next cycle.
>>>> The biggest stretch here IMO is (4) because not all Zaqar storage
>>>> backends support strict ordering, but that can be fixed at the
>>>> application layer.
>>> Correct, right now the mongodb storage is the only one with support
>>> for FIFO. This has been made optional in Kilo.
>> And just to bring up this painful point again ;)
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/030510.html
>> Please no mongodb ;)
> Folks wishing not to comply with the AGPL can choose not to do so: all
> they have to do is pay for a commercial license for MongoDB, and in any
> case this thread isn't about requiring a specific Zaqar storage backend.
> I just felt it was relevant that FIFO isn't taken for granted in Zaqar,
> but that we don't strictly need it in any case.

Ok but if only one backend in zaqar implements the feature or is 
scalable (which may not be the case in this discussion; since it appears 
FIFO isn't needed); then well u sorta have to use it (or pay as u said 
the commercial license). That sorta seems like a bad thing to force on 
people but to each there own...

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list