[openstack-dev] [Fuel] glusterfs plugin

Stanislaw Bogatkin sbogatkin at mirantis.com
Thu Apr 2 10:07:47 UTC 2015


Hi Przemyslaw,
I would be glad to be core reviewer to fuel-plugin-glusterfs as long as
seems than I was only one person who push some commits to it.

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Przemyslaw Kaminski <pkaminski at mirantis.com
> wrote:

> Since there is no reply here I have taken steps to become core reviewer
> of the (orphaned) repos [1], [2], [3], [4].
>
> Should anyone want to take responsibility for them please write me.
>
> I have also taken steps to get the fuel-qa script working and will make
> sure tests pass with new manifests. I will also update manifests'
> version so that there will be no deprecation warnings.
>
> P.
>
> [1]
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/projects/stackforge/fuel-plugin-external-glusterfs,access
> [2]
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/projects/stackforge/fuel-plugin-group-based-policy,access
> [3]
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/projects/stackforge/fuel-plugin-external-nfs,access
> [4]
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/projects/stackforge/fuel-plugin-cinder-netapp,access
>
> On 04/01/2015 03:48 PM, Przemyslaw Kaminski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been investigating bug [1] concentrating on the
> > fuel-plugin-external-glusterfs.
> >
> > First of all: [2] there are no core reviewers for Gerrit for this repo
> > so even if there was a patch to fix [1] no one could merge it. I saw
> > also fuel-plugin-external-nfs -- same issue, haven't checked other
> > repos. Why is this? Can we fix this quickly?
> >
> > Second, the plugin throws:
> >
> > DEPRECATION WARNING: The plugin has old 1.0 package format, this format
> > does not support many features, such as plugins updates, find plugin in
> > new format or migrate and rebuild this one.
> >
> > I don't think this is appropriate for a plugin that is listed in the
> > official catalog [3].
> >
> > Third, I created a supposed fix for this bug [4] and wanted to test it
> > with the fuel-qa scripts. Basically I built an .fp file with
> > fuel-plugin-builder from that code, set the GLUSTER_PLUGIN_PATH variable
> > to point to that .fp file and then ran the
> > group=deploy_ha_one_controller_glusterfs tests. The test failed [5].
> > Then I reverted the changes from the patch and the test still failed
> > [6]. But installing the plugin by hand shows that it's available there
> > so I don't know if it's broken plugin test or am I still missing
> something.
> >
> > It would be nice to get some QA help here.
> >
> > P.
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415058
> > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/577,members
> > [3] https://fuel-infra.org/plugins/catalog.html
> > [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169683/
> > [5]
> >
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/1mhz8gtm2j391mr/fail_error_deploy_ha_one_controller_glusterfs_simple-2015_04_01__11_39_11.tar.xz?dl=0
> > [6]
> >
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/ehjox554xl23xgv/fail_error_deploy_ha_one_controller_glusterfs_simple-2015_04_01__13_16_11.tar.xz?dl=0
> >
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150402/3d438b3b/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list