[openstack-dev] The Evolution of core developer to maintainer?
jaypipes at gmail.com
Thu Apr 2 01:06:30 UTC 2015
On 04/01/2015 03:23 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> The problem I see now, is that random people who has very little
> knowledge of $PROJECT or OpenStack as its whole jump in random review
> and put a -1 in Gerrit. And then never remove it. And then your patch is
> stuck for ever in review. Probably because we pushed people to review
> patches, because we needed review, etc. Personally this is hitting me
> back a lot and I'm getting more and more tired of that. How can you have
> people reviewing code when then never even wrote a patch on the project?
We encourage people to do code reviews as a way to get involved in the
project, to learn about the code base, to learn from the core reviewer
team. We encourage people to do bug fixing and commit useful patches in
the same way.
If the core team won't take the time to help new contributors
participate in the project, that is a problem with the core team members.
If you don't like someone's review feedback, tell them. Teach them and
guide them to more productive contributions. If you don't speak up, you
cannot expect the person to change their actions.
> I've _never_ used only review numbers to put people to core reviewer. We
> had people trying to play the game that way, but I don't think you can
> become a core reviewer any code if you never fixed a bug nor wrote a
> patch in a project.
Show me a single person that is in a core team or that has been
nominated for a core team that never pushed a patch or fixed a bug in
More information about the OpenStack-dev