Open Stack

I'm in HP, but not in the group that owns this effort, so I don't know what its status is.  There is a havana-based implementation floating around somewhere inside HP.  I'll ask around to see what I can find out.

I'm pretty sure there's nothing going on in the community.

Chuck

On Sep 19, 2014, at 5:28 AM, Giuseppe Cossu <giuseppe.cossu at create-net.org> wrote:

> Chuck,
> It seems quite interesting! Are hp or community working to implement it?
> 
> Giuseppe 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Carlino, Chuck [mailto:chuck.carlino at hp.com]
>> Sent: 19 September 2014 04:52
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota
>> 
>> When you say 'associate to VMs', that would be associating to neutron
> ports,
>> right?  If so, this is a subset of what is in:
>> 
>> 
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-port-template-frame
> work
>> 
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-port-template-polic
> y
>> 
>> which also include things like bandwidth guarantees and security policy.
> I'm
>> not sure if anyone is pursuing these right now, but there may be some
> useful
>> ideas in there.
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 18, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Giuseppe Cossu <giuseppe.cossu at create-
>> net.org<mailto:giuseppe.cossu at create-net.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> I'm aware it's not so easy to define a solution, so I'll expose my idea.
>> I was thinking about a "network flavor" that a tenant can associate to
> VMs.
>> Basically the network flavour is a QoS policy.
>> The admin can define the network flavors (Gold, Silver, ... call it as
> you
>> want) with a set of parameters (some visible to user, some not).
>> If we define this kind of flavours, a related quota should be define to
> keep
>> track the network resources.
>> 
>> Giuseppe
>> 
>> From: Veiga, Anthony
>> [mailto:Anthony_Veiga at cable.comcast.com<http://cable.comcast.com>]
>> Sent: 10 September 2014 15:11
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Using the quota system would be a nice option to have.
>> 
>> Can you clarify what you mean by cumulative bandwidth for the tenant? It
> would
>> be possible to rate limit at the tenant router, but having a cumulative
> limit
>> enforced inside of a tenant would be difficult.
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Giuseppe Cossu <giuseppe.cossu at create-
>> net.org<mailto:giuseppe.cossu at create-net.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello everyone,
>> 
>> Looking at the QoS blueprint (proposed for incubation), I suggest to
> consider
>> adding some parameters to Neutron Quotas. Let's suppose using rate-limit
> for
>> managing QoS. The quota parameters could be such as rate_limit (per
> port) and
>> max_bandwidth (per tenant). In this way it is possible to set/manage QoS
>> quotas from the admin side, and for instance set the maximum bandwidth
> allowed
>> per tenant (cumulative).
>> 
>> What do you think about it?
>> 
>> I'm cautious about this.  We'd either need to allow a "Number of DSCP
>> settings" and set them outside the quota or leave it out altogether.
> Let's
>> not forget that there's more than just rate limiting in QoS, and we need
> to
>> make sure all the options are included.  Otherwise, there's going to be
> a lot
>> of user and operator confusion as to what is and isn't considered part
> of the
>> quota.
>> -Anthony
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Giuseppe
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------
>> Giuseppe Cossu
>> CREATE-NET
>> --------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> 
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> 
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Kevin Benton
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> 
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> 
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev